![archicad to revit archicad to revit](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bHWh7-hIKfI/maxresdefault.jpg)
If you want to have a different representation, you need to either change the view (with effects downstream where the view is used) or create a new one. View templates > As a disadvantage I see is that you can only navigate inside Revit using the Views. IMHO, the control using layers in ArchiCAD is fairly easy to grasp by end users, certainly when coming from CAD, whereas the visibility of things inside Revit requires a lot of toggling of options in a large, non-graphical, table dialog. Is that a + or a -? You indicate B- whereas Revit without layers receives A. Seeing that Renovation Filters are mentioned for ArchiCAD, it's not that old ) 15 or 16 at least.ĪrchiCAD has layers and good control over them. Revit 2013 view templates are excellent and function is a predictable manner.
![archicad to revit archicad to revit](https://fiverr-res.cloudinary.com/images/t_main1,q_auto,f_auto,q_auto,f_auto/gigs/142332331/original/214b9c9f13d1b7d93d91044b0b22066c5fafcf9d/bim-l-revit-l-360-rendering-and-archicad-expert.png)
Although this works well, it is difficult for lower skilled View templates per se in ArchiCAD, however clone folders and settingsĪssigned to views in the view map are similar. Each view can be modified with theĭisplayed by Model elements, annotation elements, analytical, Revit links, Has built in Ceiling view types that control how elements are displayed. Options control whether the door swings, window tags or other elements areĭifficult for lower skilled non-software-savvy people to grasp. Phases and worksets to replace the layer paradigm No layers! Revit uses visibility graphic controls, Management issue on large and long running projects. Are shown or hidden, locked or unlocked, hidden line or solid, and wallĪre used to define specific drawing view types.